Below is a book review exploring the "faith" issues raised by the show. This review was published earlier this summer via the Academy of Parish Clergy and their journal "Sharing the Practice".
Crome, Andrew and James McGrath, eds., Religion and Doctor Who: Time and Relative Dimensions in Faith. (Eugene, OR: Cascade Books, 2013). ISBN #978-1-62564-377-3. $40.00
Regarding
Doctor Who, a team of writers have
produced “Religion and Doctor Who”,
exploring the issues of “Time and Relative Dimensions in Faith”. (Note:
The subtitle is an in joke.) Over
the show’s fifty years and counting, the writers and producers have engaged issues
of changing social and moral values, taking a show sometimes remembered in its
earlier decades of “wobbly sets” and not-so Star
Wars type effects and influencing the lives of viewers well beyond its
original mandate to be educational children’s television programming.
At
the outset, the editors counterpoint the show’s start in 1963 with Christianity’s
decline beginning in the United Kingdom and the growth of pluralism as well as
secularization. The essayists offer a
volume “designed to enhance our understanding of popular culture; how people
make use of science fiction in their religious practice and what religious
themes in this culture say about secularization” (p. xxiv). The sets may have wobbled, but the good
Doctor’s adventures inspired many to explore the fundamental questions vexing
humanity throughout the eons.
In
his essay “Why Time Lords Do Not Live Forever”, ethicist Courtland Lewis
explores Doctor Who’s negative
depiction of immortality, often casting the idea as a fool’s errand, especially
when the search impairs one’s ability to live in the “now”. A number of “bad guys” find their comeuppance
grasping at power. While long-lived, the
Doctor himself is driven far more by risk and compassion. Even he is able to “regenerate” anew his body
and appearance when death threatens, his different incarnations usually meet
their end in noble ways for the sake of others.
Other
essayists explore the implications of persons following the Doctor into his
adventures. Called “companions” in the fan
lore, some of these women and men find themselves in a “teacher/student”
relationship with the Doctor. Brigid
Cherry traces the narrative arc of Martha Jones, a young medical student who
travels with the Doctor and blossoms into a sort of apostle. When the Doctor is imprisoned by an old enemy
now in control of the world, Martha carries a message of hope to Earth’s people.
A
far-fetched tale to modern ears perhaps, yet Martha’s journey resonates with
early Christian missionaries spreading the gospel against the Empire’s claims. The given Doctor
Who storyline features a rather overt messianic motif when the Doctor overcomes
his captor and saves the day thanks to the belief psychically given in a moment
of global solidarity. The Doctor’s foe
(known as the Master, irony of ironies) is puzzled how something akin to prayer
could be used against his dominating power. Like many religious narratives, hope and trust
will overcome the powers that be.
Another
essay considers the shadow side of placing one’s faith in the Doctor. British scholar Tim Jones compares stories
from divergent periods in the show’s history ("The Curse of Fenric", 1989 and "The God Complex", 2011) involving plot
lines with companions experiencing crises of faith regarding their trust in the
Doctor. In both stories, Jones illumines
the various competing claims religion and ideology play in the lives of each
story’s characters. He observes how the 2011 story (“The God Complex”) reflects
the more skeptical era of its 21st-century public in England and
abroad. Reflecting today’s British
movement toward secularization, faith is portrayed as if illusory and therefore
obscuring reality’s truths. The 2011
story is a far cry from the 1989 era story, as the earlier story revolves
around faith getting challenged yet being affirmed in the end. The older story concludes with the Doctor’s
companion Ace, a troubled young adult, experiencing a cleansing moment of
clarity similar to baptism.
As
the formative influence of Christendom ebbs, the nineteen essays reflect the
possibilities of a more pluralistic Britain. One contributor reviews the Buddhist
themes to be found within the narrative arc of the Tenth Doctor, portrayed by
Scottish actor (and clergy kid) David Tennant from 2006-2010. A further essay compares the work of Russell
T. Davies and Steven Moffat, the two lead producers of Doctor Who’s post-2005 era, demonstrating how their various stories
reference the Church of England and institutional religion. The Davies and Moffat eras reflect the
plurality of perspectives about religion and society, though institutional
religion (i.e. Western Christianity by way of the Church of England) appears to
be muddled at best in the present and potentially irrelevant to humanity
(Davies) or at least its core tenets in the far future (Moffat). Perhaps it is a case of art imitating reality
as another essayist, Presbyterian minister (and American fan) Laura Brekke
observes,
In
2010, more than 10.4 million viewers in the UK alone watched the fifth series
finale of Doctor Who, while fewer
than one million people sat in the Church of England pews each Sunday (p. 94).
While
I enjoyed reading this collection, I found myself at a familiar crossroads from
reading similar books connecting popular culture with religion. An essayist is
faced with a daunting task of engaging divergent audiences, ensuring no
scholar, fan or curious reader is lost in a veritable vortex of academic/ecclesial
“in speak” or wading through fifty years of a television show’s core concepts
and continuity. On the latter count, the
essayists have a particular challenge, given a show about time travel has been
known to break its own established rules.
A brief essay suggests we consider the midrashic implications of Doctor Who’s many adventures, including
those in original novels and authorized audio dramas bringing back older actors
with new stories set the show’s previous seasons. It may take a reader to have deep knowledge
of the “source material,” regardless if it is “the faith” we keep or decline or
the vast possibilities (and convoluted continuities) within the “canon” of Doctor Who.
From
time to time, I quibbled with the ways essayists referenced the series,
sometimes as a seminary graduate and other times as a diehard fan. I would encourage clergy to view some
episodes referenced in the essays, an easy task with many of the newer seasons
(and some “classic era” ones) readily available via streaming video services. Make acquaintance with the Doctor in all his
incarnations and ponder his adventures.
The experience may enliven a Saturday night, if not your Sunday sermon.